Changing bit width of SAML11 DAUTHSTATUS.NSID and .NSNID fields to 2#7
Open
rubikstoroid wants to merge 1 commit intoMicrochip-MPLAB-Harmony:masterfrom
Open
Changing bit width of SAML11 DAUTHSTATUS.NSID and .NSNID fields to 2#7rubikstoroid wants to merge 1 commit intoMicrochip-MPLAB-Harmony:masterfrom
rubikstoroid wants to merge 1 commit intoMicrochip-MPLAB-Harmony:masterfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I noticed while trying to run
svd2ruston one of the ATSAML11 SVD files that the operation failed with the following message:All 6 of the ATSAML11 SVD files appear to have an issue with the NSID and NSNID fields of the DAUTHSTATUS register, in that they set enumerated values of 2 and 3 for a field that is stated to be only 1 bit wide.
I looked at
core_cm23.hand that file confirms that these fields should actually be 2 bits wide:I fixed the issue in these fields and
svd2rustruns successfully now. I haven't attempted to determine whether a similar issue may exist elsewhere.