adding thinking preferences to book + adding text to thinking prefere…

…nces qmd to this branch

materials/_quarto.yml

@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ book:
         - session_04.qmd # install R and Git
         - session_05.qmd # R and github set up
         - session_06.qmd # intro to github
+        - session_07.qmd # thinking preferences
 
 
 

materials/sections/collaboration-thinking-preferences.qmd

@@ -1 +1,62 @@
-INSERT ONE OF THE THIKING PREFERENCES VERSIONS
+## Learning Objectives {.unnumbered}
+
+An activity and discussion that will provide: 
+
+- Opportunity to get to know fellow participants and trainers 
+- An introduction to variation in thinking preferences
+- Discuss about important norms and polices when working in research teams
+
+
+## Thinking Preferences Activity
+
+Step 1: 
+
+- Don't read ahead!! We're headed to the patio.
+
+
+### About the Whole Brain Thinking System
+
+Everyone thinks differently. The way individuals think guides the way they work, and the way groups of individuals think guides how teams work. Understanding thinking preferences facilitates effective collaboration and team work.
+
+The Whole Brain Model, developed by Ned Herrmann, builds upon early conceptualizations of brain functioning. For example, the left and right hemispheres were thought to be associated with different types of information processing while our neocortex and limbic system would regulate different functions and behaviours.
+
+
+![](images/Brain.jpg)
+
+The Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument (HBDI) provides insight into dominant characteristics based on thinking preferences. There are four major thinking styles that reflect the left cerebral, left limbic, right cerebral and right limbic.
+
+- Analytical (Blue)
+- Practical (Green)
+- Relational (Red)
+- Experimental (Yellow)
+
+![](images/WholeBrain.jpg)
+
+These four thinking styles are characterized by different traits. Those in the BLUE quadrant have a strong logical and rational side. They analyze information and may be technical in their approach to problems. They are interested in the 'what' of a situation. Those in the GREEN quadrant have a strong organizational and sequential side. They like to plan details and are methodical in their approach. They are interested in the 'when' of a situation.  The RED quadrant includes those that are feelings-based in their apporach. They have strong interpersonal skills and are good communicators. They are interested in the 'who' of a situation. Those in the YELLOW quadrant are ideas people. They are imaginative, conceptual thinkers that explore outside the box. Yellows are interested in the 'why' of a situation.  
+
+![](images/WholeBrainTraits.jpg)
+
+Most of us identify with thinking styles in more than one quadrant and these different thinking preferences reflect a complex self made up of our rational, theoretical self; our ordered, safekeeping self; our emotional, interpersonal self; and our imaginitive, experimental self.
+
+![](images/ComplexSelf.jpg)
+
+Understanding the complexity of how people think and process information helps us understand not only our own approach to problem solving, but also how individuals within a team can contribute. There is great value in diversity of thinking styles within collaborative teams, each type bringing strengths to different aspects of project development.
+
+![](images/WorkingStyles.jpg)
+
+### Bonus Activity
+
+Step 1: 
+
+- Read through the statements contained within this [document](files/ThinkingPreferencesMapping.pdf) and determine which descriptors are most like you. Make a note of them.
+-  Review the descriptors again and determine which are quite like you.
+-  You are working towards identifying your top 20. If you have more than 20, discard the descriptors that resonate the least.
+- Using the letter codes in the right hand column, count the number of descriptors that fall into the categories A B C and D.
+
+Step 2: 
+
+- Scroll to the second page and copy the graphic onto a piece of paper, completing the quadrant with your scores for A, B, C and D.
+
+Step 3: 
+
+- Reflect and share out: Do you have a dominant letter? Were some of the statements you included in your top 20 easier to resonate with than others? Were you answering based on how  you *are* or how you wish to be? 

materials/session_07.qmd

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-title: "Hands On Synthesis"
+title: "Thinking Preferences"
 title-block-banner: true 
 format:
   html:
@@ -8,10 +8,6 @@ format:
 ---
 
 
-:::callout-note
-Time for groups to get together and advance in their synthesis projects.
-:::
-
-<!--{{< include /sections/git-github-intro.qmd >}}-->
+{{< include /sections/collaboration-thinking-preferences.qmd >}}