add Python type hints

[egpbos]

Added a subsection on type hints, following the discussion in #310. Also added a few cool libraries, e.g. FastAPI that was mentioned by Bouwe in #54 and Typer from the same author.

Fixes #310.

Checklist

SIGNIFICANT changes / additions, e.g. new chapters

• I checked whether the contribution fits in The Turing Way before considering contributing to this Guide.
• I discussed my contribution in an issue and took into account feedback.

ALL contributions

• I previewed my changes locally using e.g. python3 -m http.server 4000 and confirmed they work correctly.
• I checked for broken links, e.g. using the link checker GitHub Action workflow, or locally by using docker run --init -it -v `pwd`:/docs lycheeverse/lychee /docs --config=docs/lychee.toml, at least for the files I changed.
• My name was added to the CITATION.cff file.

[bouweandela]

Thanks @egpbos, very nice addition!

[egpbos]

@stefsmeets We talked today about attrs and how you used it for nested-yaml / dataclass validation and preferred it over Pydantic. In this PR, I happened to add a bit of text on Pydantic. I haven't looked at attrs yet, but do you think it makes sense to mention it in here as well? Or does it deserve a topic of its own? Is schema / data validation perhaps a useful topic for a section of the data chapter?

[stefsmeets]

I think it makes sense, I find attrs to be much more approachable than pydantic. The attrs docs have a really nice section on comparing the different tools: https://www.attrs.org/en/stable/why.html

[egpbos]

Briefly browsing PROTEUS' use of attrs, it seems like a nice lightweight tool for value validation. I'm not sure how (or even if) Pydantic handles this, but certainly seems useful. I don't think it should go under this PR, though, it's a topic independent of type hints.

[egpbos]

Whoops, missed your comment @stefsmeets before posting mine just now. Agree, it looks nice and lightweight. Lets make a separate issue.

[egpbos]

The attrs discussion will be continued in #364.