Skip to content

Conversation

rraustad
Copy link
Contributor

@rraustad rraustad commented Oct 10, 2025

Pull request overview

  • Fixes developer mistake in getting default field value

Description of the purpose of this PR

Someone pointed out some dead code

Pull Request Author

  • Title of PR should be user-synopsis style (clearly understandable in a standalone changelog context)
  • Label the PR with at least one of: Defect, Refactoring, NewFeature, Performance, and/or DoNoPublish
  • Pull requests that impact EnergyPlus code must also include unit tests to cover enhancement or defect repair
  • Author should provide a "walkthrough" of relevant code changes using a GitHub code review comment process
  • If any diffs are expected, author must demonstrate they are justified using plots and descriptions
  • If changes fix a defect, the fix should be demonstrated in plots and descriptions
  • If any defect files are updated to a more recent version, upload new versions here or on DevSupport
  • If IDD requires transition, transition source, rules, ExpandObjects, and IDFs must be updated, and add IDDChange label
  • If structural output changes, add to output rules file and add OutputChange label
  • If adding/removing any LaTeX docs or figures, update that document's CMakeLists file dependencies

Reviewer

  • Perform a Code Review on GitHub
  • If branch is behind develop, merge develop and build locally to check for side effects of the merge
  • If defect, verify by running develop branch and reproducing defect, then running PR and reproducing fix
  • If feature, test running new feature, try creative ways to break it
  • CI status: all green or justified
  • Check that performance is not impacted (CI Linux results include performance check)
  • Run Unit Test(s) locally
  • Check any new function arguments for performance impacts
  • Verify IDF naming conventions and styles, memos and notes and defaults
  • If new idf included, locally check the err file and other outputs

@rraustad rraustad added this to the EnergyPlus 25.2 milestone Oct 10, 2025
@rraustad rraustad added the DoNotPublish Includes changes that shouldn't be reported in the changelog label Oct 10, 2025
@rraustad
Copy link
Contributor Author

rraustad commented Oct 10, 2025

Excess safety in getInput for EIR HP default. Works as intended without the unused warning:

A19, \field Heat Pump Defrost Control
    \type choice
    \key None
    \key Timed
    \key OnDemand
    \key TimedEmpirical
    \note A blank field is the same as None.
N13, \field Heat Pump Defrost Time Period Fraction
    \type real
    \minimum 0.0
    \default 0.058333

Modified PlantLoopHeatPump_EIR_AirSource to test as:

HeatPump:PlantLoop:EIR:Heating,
  (snip)
  CapCurveFuncTemp,        !- Capacity Modifier Function of Temperature Curve Name
  EIRCurveFuncTemp,        !- Electric Input to Output Ratio Modifier Function of Temperature Curve Name
  EIRCurveFuncPLR,         !- Electric Input to Output Ratio Modifier Function of Part Load Ratio Curve Name
  ,
  ,
  ,
  ,
  ,
  ,
  ,
  ,
  ,
  ,
  ,
  Timed;  !- Heat Pump Defrost Control
          !- Heat Pump Defrost Time Period Fraction field intentionally not included to make sure json was grabbing default.
image

@rraustad rraustad requested a review from mitchute October 10, 2025 17:33
@mitchute
Copy link
Collaborator

mitchute commented Oct 10, 2025

Thanks @rraustad. It looks like there's a few more of these patterns scattered throughout this file. Not critical, but should we clean those up here?

Real64 defaultVal_sizeFactor = 1.0;
if (!state.dataInputProcessing->inputProcessor->getDefaultValue(
state, cCurrentModuleObject, "sizing_factor", defaultVal_sizeFactor)) {
ShowSevereError(state, "EIR FFHP: Sizing factor not entered and could not get default value");
errorsFound = true;
} else {
thisPLHP.sizingFactor = defaultVal_sizeFactor;
}

@mitchute mitchute merged commit 5126a73 into develop Oct 12, 2025
11 checks passed
@mitchute mitchute deleted the QuickFix-EIRHP-defrost-default branch October 12, 2025 16:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

DoNotPublish Includes changes that shouldn't be reported in the changelog

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants