Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

896 prefer static intersecting layers #1031

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

allthesignals
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR addresses #896 by reducing the # of dynamic intersecting layer calculations.

Instead 3 of the layers' intersections are inferred from columns directly available on the lot.

There are more available intersecting layers but they might be available on another file see: NYCPlanning/db-pluto#55

@allthesignals allthesignals requested a review from a team as a code owner October 27, 2021 04:50
@allthesignals allthesignals force-pushed the 896-prefer-static-intersecting-layers branch 3 times, most recently from f66551c to 33c320c Compare October 27, 2021 04:54
…operty on lot model rather than on-the-fly spatial intersection
@allthesignals allthesignals force-pushed the 896-prefer-static-intersecting-layers branch from 33c320c to 815bd5e Compare October 27, 2021 04:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant