[18.0][MIG] quality_control_oca #1523
Open
+82,722
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@AaronHForgeFlow I think this improvement #1278 should be included during migration |
|
@AaronHForgeFlow Another one to include here #1508 |
|
|
AaronHForgeFlow
force-pushed
the
18.0-mig-quality_control_oca
branch
from
f3303c7 to
5949f1b
Compare
Both added! |
AndreuOForgeFlow
suggested changes
Jun 5, 2025
RE-EDIT 😆 @AaronHForgeFlow this one has been fixed and merged in 16 |
AaronHForgeFlow
force-pushed
the
18.0-mig-quality_control_oca
branch
2 times, most recently
from
c18d359 to
6eeb033
Compare
|
@AaronHForgeFlow could you try to fix conflicts here? |
…d new concepts. * Triggers for product category * ACLs * Tolerances in questions * one2many copyable * Fix some views * Error on same tolerance * Colors on inspection lines * Unify inspection header data assignment in set_test method * key name in set_test * Change icon set
…les * Trigger line instead of test and user
* Expand AUTHORS * Fix permissions
* security modified * some demo info added * Added "partner_selectable" field, so that inspections can by made by partner * Little view fixing, field was oe_edit_only instead of label * Add partners to trigger lines * Tests added * Trigger lines with duplicated test cleaned quality_control: Propose to OCA quality_control: required changes quality_control: Fixing coveralls quality_control_stock: * added demo data * replaced unlink method by ondelete="cascade" * required changes
Making it a regular field, you can put any manual quantity in inspections
…pections only by quality control managers
…ee view of the fields correctly
Currently translated at 100.0% (162 of 162 strings) Translation: manufacture-17.0/manufacture-17.0-quality_control_oca Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/manufacture-17-0/manufacture-17-0-quality_control_oca/sv/
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: manufacture-17.0/manufacture-17.0-quality_control_oca Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/manufacture-17-0/manufacture-17-0-quality_control_oca/
Currently translated at 74.3% (119 of 160 strings) Translation: manufacture-17.0/manufacture-17.0-quality_control_oca Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/manufacture-17-0/manufacture-17-0-quality_control_oca/de/
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: manufacture-17.0/manufacture-17.0-quality_control_oca Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/manufacture-17-0/manufacture-17-0-quality_control_oca/
This commit adds date_done field, update views and filters and the timing field in the QC trigger line to enable following scenarios: - When timing is 'Before', an inspection is generated for each related move when a picking with the trigger is confirmed. - When timing is 'Plan Ahead', a 'Plan' inspection is generated for each related move when a picking with the trigger is confirmed. A plan inspection is just a plan, and cannot be updated except for the date. A plan inspection gets converted into an executable inspection once the picking is done.
…nd qc.inspection.line
Update create signature to use vals_list Fix raise in unlink override. Replace with api.ondelete method Allow superuser to override ondelete constraint for autogenerated inspection Replace unnecessary elif
AaronHForgeFlow
force-pushed
the
18.0-mig-quality_control_oca
branch
from
6eeb033 to
42bf074
Compare
|
@LoisRForgeFlow do you still see conflicts? In local I did not find any conflicts. In the Pull Request only PSC can see the conflicts 😕 |
I see this
Not sure if this is going to be an issue merging with ocabot |
|
The branch is already rebased, I am not sure what to do now 😞 |
|
It doesn't show differences in my local... let's move forward with reviews and let's hope there is no problem while merging. |
|
@AndreuOForgeFlow could you update your review? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Supersedes #1374
it includes #1491
cc @ForgeFlow