-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 827
[18.0][MIG] project_task_stage_state: Migration to 18.0 #1404
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[18.0][MIG] project_task_stage_state: Migration to 18.0 #1404
Conversation
[UPD] Update project_task_stage_state.pot [BOT] post-merge updates
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: project-17.0/project-17.0-project_task_stage_state Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/project-17-0/project-17-0-project_task_stage_state/
Currently translated at 100.0% (4 of 4 strings) Translation: project-17.0/project-17.0-project_task_stage_state Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/project-17-0/project-17-0-project_task_stage_state/it/
Currently translated at 100.0% (4 of 4 strings) Translation: project-17.0/project-17.0-project_task_stage_state Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/project-17-0/project-17-0-project_task_stage_state/es/
1592f5c
to
b48ad67
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TT54673
@Tecnativa @pedrobaeza @victoralmau could you review this
/ocabot migration project_task_stage_state |
project_task_stage_state/tests/test_project_task_stage_state.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
project_task_stage_state/tests/test_project_task_stage_state.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
self.task.write({"stage_id": self.stage_in_progress.id}) | ||
self.assertEqual(self.task.state, "01_in_progress") | ||
|
||
def test_task_states_dynamic_selection(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why adding all of these tests? Are they really different cases?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pedrobaeza, I removed the empty line, added copyright, and included this test case only to fix the code coverage failure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ping @pedrobaeza @victoralmau could you update your review please
b48ad67
to
cae276e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functional review OK
This PR has the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/ocabot merge nobump
On my way to merge this fine PR! |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at bfa55e7. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
No description provided.