Skip to content

Conversation

@antonioburic
Copy link
Member

@antonioburic antonioburic commented Jul 14, 2024

based on #2055
dependency sale_advance_payment still in review in #3156

@antonioburic antonioburic force-pushed the 17.0-mig-sale_automatic_workflow_advance branch from fcf0d49 to a098a6b Compare July 14, 2024 19:17
@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot migration sale_automatic_workflow_advance

@antonioburic Thanks for this. FYI, you can embed the depending PR here in order to test it on runboat and makes tests running: https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/wiki/Use-temporary-reference%28s%29-to-another-pull-request%28s%29

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 17.0 milestone Jul 17, 2024
@antonioburic antonioburic force-pushed the 17.0-mig-sale_automatic_workflow_advance branch 3 times, most recently from 22c103c to 91fc70d Compare July 21, 2024 17:58
@antonioburic antonioburic force-pushed the 17.0-mig-sale_automatic_workflow_advance branch 2 times, most recently from 37a0316 to 091bb0f Compare August 6, 2024 17:50
default=_default_journal,
check_company=True,
)
company_id = fields.Many2one(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@antonioburic IMHO, this should go into base module and not here

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done, in d90f3f7

@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

@antonioburic Could you check tests ?

@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

@antonioburic What's the status of this ?

@antonioburic antonioburic force-pushed the 17.0-mig-sale_automatic_workflow_advance branch from 091bb0f to ebc6f88 Compare June 2, 2025 09:16
@antonioburic antonioburic force-pushed the 17.0-mig-sale_automatic_workflow_advance branch from 4aee32f to d90f3f7 Compare June 2, 2025 10:15
@antonioburic
Copy link
Member Author

@rousseldenis rebased and tests resolved, thx for the review

Copy link
Contributor

@BhaveshHeliconia BhaveshHeliconia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Functional review LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants