[16.0][ADD] stock_picking_partner_note #1496
Conversation
santostelmo
force-pushed
the
16.0-add-stock_picking_partner_note
branch
from
6c9a45d to
9931852
Compare
| <field name="name" /> | ||
| <field name="note_type_id" /> | ||
| <field name="active" /> | ||
| </group> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would be useful to see the list of partners having this note
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ok, but use a smart btn rather than a direct listing of m2m
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nooooo 😨
Keop it simple, just list them, there is nothing on that view. Easier to visualize and change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A smart button wouldn't work because stock_picking_note_ids because is a M2M and not O2M.
With a button you would be able to create a new note BUT detached from the partner.
I keep the simple version showing the notes directly in the form
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A smart button wouldn't work because stock_picking_note_ids because is a M2M and not O2M.
With a button you would be able to create a new note BUT detached from the partner.
This is wrong. You will have an action to handle the btn and you can search for the records you need. No matter if o2m or m2m.
Regarding creation, that's wrong too: you simply have to set the default partner in the context.
I keep the simple version showing the notes directly in the form
Ok, but that's about time and not about possibilities 😉
| <field name="name" /> | ||
| <field name="note_type_id" /> | ||
| <field name="active" /> | ||
| </group> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ok, but use a smart btn rather than a direct listing of m2m
santostelmo
force-pushed
the
16.0-add-stock_picking_partner_note
branch
2 times, most recently
from
a380262 to
8a2e5fe
Compare
| <field name="name" /> | ||
| <field name="note_type_id" /> | ||
| <field name="active" /> | ||
| </group> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A smart button wouldn't work because stock_picking_note_ids because is a M2M and not O2M.
With a button you would be able to create a new note BUT detached from the partner.
This is wrong. You will have an action to handle the btn and you can search for the records you need. No matter if o2m or m2m.
Regarding creation, that's wrong too: you simply have to set the default partner in the context.
I keep the simple version showing the notes directly in the form
Ok, but that's about time and not about possibilities 😉
stock_picking_partner_note/views/stock_picking_partner_note_menus.xml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
stock_picking_partner_note/views/stock_picking_partner_note_menus.xml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
santostelmo
force-pushed
the
16.0-add-stock_picking_partner_note
branch
from
8a2e5fe to
1495d90
Compare
santostelmo
force-pushed
the
16.0-add-stock_picking_partner_note
branch
from
1495d90 to
355a504
Compare
simahawk
changed the title
|
Note: Purpose is to remove from shopfloor the shopfloor.packing.info and replace it by this more generic module. |
|
This PR has the |
|
/ocabot merge nobump |
|
This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it! |
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 57860b2. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Allow to record a message for the person in charge of order preparation at the level of the customer,
then have it as a note on the picking transfer.
Example: Max pallet height 1m20
Note: This will allow to remove from shopfloor the shopfloor.packing.info and replace it by this more generic module.