Skip to content

[16.0][ADD] stock_picking_batch_actual_date #1972

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 16.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AungKoKoLin1997
Copy link
Contributor

@AungKoKoLin1997 AungKoKoLin1997 commented May 29, 2025

This module adds an Actual Date field on batch transfers, which is automatically propagated to all associated pickings.

@qrtl QT5448

This comment was marked as resolved.

@AungKoKoLin1997 AungKoKoLin1997 force-pushed the 16.0-add-stock_picking_batch_actual_date branch from 1535aac to 42fd8a9 Compare June 4, 2025 01:59
@AungKoKoLin1997 AungKoKoLin1997 force-pushed the 16.0-add-stock_picking_batch_actual_date branch from 42fd8a9 to 877b981 Compare June 5, 2025 01:59
@AungKoKoLin1997 AungKoKoLin1997 force-pushed the 16.0-add-stock_picking_batch_actual_date branch from 877b981 to aa4c3f3 Compare June 5, 2025 08:03
@AungKoKoLin1997 AungKoKoLin1997 force-pushed the 16.0-add-stock_picking_batch_actual_date branch from aa4c3f3 to 90c9373 Compare June 5, 2025 09:32
Copy link
Member

@yostashiro yostashiro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code review. LGTM.

Copy link

@nobuQuartile nobuQuartile left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM Functional test and code review

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants