-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Smtp server detection 1125 v2.5 #11327
Smtp server detection 1125 v2.5 #11327
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #11327 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.41% 82.40% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 934 934
Lines 247239 247326 +87
==========================================
+ Hits 203773 203804 +31
- Misses 43466 43522 +56
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
Just realized the changes are in this PR but the baseline had more ftp-tx in stats. How could I printf out for ftp-tx without the changes? |
I hope the less ftp txs come from more smtp flows that are printed... |
Ok I can pull the SMTP then |
So we have 141 more ftp.tx in the pcap from lolstmpX flows compared to master but the last PR had 5658 ftp.tx difference between master8 and the PR. Sounds like we need a master printf too to get all packets that ftp.tx have then? |
WARNING:
Pipeline 21142 |
Thanks Corey, #11333 should be better for FTP |
Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/1125
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/6821
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/5491
Describe changes:
SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#1894
#11314 with dummy debug prints for @ct0br0