-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
Xdp tunnel 7674 v6.9 #14017
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
catenacyber
wants to merge
14
commits into
OISF:main
Choose a base branch
from
catenacyber:xdp-tunnel-7674-v6.9
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Xdp tunnel 7674 v6.9 #14017
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Instead of directly accessing the field Will allow PacketTunnelType to hold the precise tunnel type like DECODE_TUNNEL_ERSPANII with a modification of PacketIsTunnelChild
Closed
7c52d9b
to
5835c90
Compare
So that we know for a packet which precise type of tunnel it is (like erspan2).
ebpf program does not handle 3 layers of vlan
Ticket: 7717 Allows for instance to process/log ARP packets over VXLAN. That means we need to decode the ethernet layer above vxlan instead of skipping it as part of the vxlan, even if the vxlan decoder still checks the ethernet layer to avoid FPs.
to save memory
5835c90
to
d4aedfe
Compare
Ticket: 7674 To distinguish flows with the same 5-tuple but coming from different tunnel sources.
Ticket: 7674
Ticket: 7674
Ticket: 7674 On interfaces meant to receive only tunneled traffic
for SV to run tests based on the presence of this feature
d4aedfe
to
c0c82ab
Compare
so as to run ebpf live tests
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #14017 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 83.87% 83.63% -0.24%
==========================================
Files 1011 1012 +1
Lines 275671 278158 +2487
==========================================
+ Hits 231207 232633 +1426
- Misses 44464 45525 +1061
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
WARNING:
Pipeline = 27971 |
See SV questions about the CI failures |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Link to ticket: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/7674
Describe changes:
Provide values to any of the below to override the defaults.
SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#2688
#13839 rebased, with SV test live
Adds a commit features: add EBPF as a feature for this SV test