Skip to content

Conversation

victorjulien
Copy link
Member

Better track the state so it's known when to expect a base64 request message. Also better validate the base64.

Ticket: #7994.

No SV as the only PCAP I have is very private and also requires the sslproxy work.

Better track the state so it's known when to expect a base64 request
message. Also better validate the base64.

Ticket: OISF#7994.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 15, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 8.16327% with 45 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84.42%. Comparing base (93c0409) to head (4151db1).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14035      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.43%   84.42%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1011     1011              
  Lines      272251   272285      +34     
==========================================
- Hits       229876   229866      -10     
- Misses      42375    42419      +44     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 63.39% <8.16%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
livemode 19.45% <0.00%> (+0.10%) ⬆️
pcap 44.78% <6.12%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 65.17% <6.12%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
unittests 59.44% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline = 27991

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

No SV as the only PCAP I have is very private and also requires the sslproxy work

Could you not craft one ? (with ./libhtp/htptopcap.py or similar)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants