Skip to content

Conversation

@rouault
Copy link
Member

@rouault rouault commented Sep 18, 2024

No description provided.

@rouault
Copy link
Member Author

rouault commented Sep 25, 2024

any feedback on this: good idea or not? The downside I can see is that our "summary" of operations becomes a monstrous long line (especially due to the lengthy descriptions of the areas of use)

@jjimenezshaw
Copy link
Contributor

The idea sounds good to me. For some reason time dependent operations are getting more common. With the new US systems it is going to be even more, right?

@rouault
Copy link
Member Author

rouault commented Sep 25, 2024

With the new US systems it is going to be even more, right?

Maybe... ? (looks like we'll have reach retirement age at the time they are ready) More seriously, I've that recollection that the dynamic stuff will be for advanced users and that for mortals who can only handle static CRS they will create a "snapshot" of the datum every 5 years of so.

@kbevers
Copy link
Member

kbevers commented Sep 26, 2024

I think this is a good solution

@rouault rouault merged commit d19ab64 into OSGeo:master Sep 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants