toward extended use of dimensionless empty variable for metadata.adoc #232
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Following meeting discussion of the 23/05, it is suggested here to extend the use of dimensionless empty variable for metadata that are currently defined as variables. This is expected for a future version of the format (1.X)... even if i think this could be accepted rapidely ;) Also, this brings more coherence (in my opinion) to the format by harmonizing the way we identify "metadata".
vturpin
added
the
1.X
vturpin
requested review from
glidermann,
castelao,
justinbuck,
kerfoot,
tcarval,
emmerbodc and
callumrollo
as code owners
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following meeting discussion of the 23/05, it is suggested here to extend the use of dimensionless empty variable for metadata that are currently defined as variables.
This is expected for a future version of the format (1.X)... even if i think this could be accepted rapidely ;)
Also, this brings more coherence (in my opinion) to the format by harmonizing the way we identify "metadata".
Proponents:
Moderator: @OceanGlidersCommunity/format-mantainers
Type of PR
related to issue #220