Skip to content

build: cherry-pick 6.0 version change and changelogs #14311

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 22, 2025

Conversation

qinzhouxu
Copy link
Contributor

cherry-pick changelog and versions

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.99%. Comparing base (4b95377) to head (ba1f45c).
Report is 3 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev   #14311      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.00%   89.99%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         647      647              
  Lines       38795    38800       +5     
  Branches     7786     7620     -166     
==========================================
- Hits        34919    34918       -1     
- Misses       1759     1766       +7     
+ Partials     2117     2116       -1     

see 6 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@qinzhouxu qinzhouxu merged commit eb1380c into dev Jul 22, 2025
19 of 20 checks passed
@qinzhouxu qinzhouxu deleted the qinzhouxu/cherry-pick branch July 22, 2025 06:26
qinzhouxu added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants