Update dependency jinja2 to v3.1.5 [SECURITY] #518
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
==3.1.4
->==3.1.5
GitHub Vulnerability Alerts
CVE-2024-56326
An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to
str.format
allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code.To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates.
Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to
str.format
and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string'sformat
method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox.CVE-2024-56201
A bug in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker that controls both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, regardless of if Jinja's sandbox is used.
To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control both the filename and the contents of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates where the template author can also choose the template filename.
Release Notes
pallets/jinja (jinja2)
v3.1.5
Compare Source
Unreleased
render
for an async template usesasyncio.run
.:pr:
1952
auto_aiter
warnings. :pr:1960
aclose
-ableAsyncGenerator
fromTemplate.generate_async
. :pr:1960
root_render_func()
unclosed inTemplate.generate_async
. :pr:1960
:pr:
1960
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.