Enable GlitchTip via pino-sentry

[bickelj]

Issue #1613 Implement audit logging (HTTP request level, 3 of 3)

[bickelj]

I tried pino-sentry-transport locally but entered dep hell, e.g. tomer-yechiel/pino-sentry-transport#272

[bickelj]

Yeah, ESLint wants it to be created here, I'm pretty sure that we only want to instantiate pino exactly once, though, and the various types pino accepts as the second arg make this the seemingly least worst solution.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 77.77778% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.02%. Comparing base (7cbf883) to head (42abfb5).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/logger.ts	77.77%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2081      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.06%   93.02%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         304      304              
  Lines        3534     3542       +8     
  Branches      505      508       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         3289     3295       +6     
- Misses        245      247       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[slifty]

@kfogel @bickelj I get the sense we ended up hitting pause on this PR -- should we close the PR, or prioritize finishing it (the branch can stick around of course, if we wanna move forward again)