Skip to content

Conversation

matthieucan
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@jochemvandooren jochemvandooren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, great improvements 🖐️ Left small comments.

Also I think showcasing the output at the start of the README makes a lot of sense; when I look into new tools I always look for a practical use-case first, before reading the actual README

@matthieucan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also I think showcasing the output at the start of the README makes a lot of sense; when I look into new tools I always look for a practical use-case first, before reading the actual README

I added another (simpler) example at the top. PTAL!

Copy link
Contributor

@jochemvandooren jochemvandooren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect! New look 😎

@matthieucan matthieucan merged commit 47cf9d3 into master Sep 23, 2025
4 checks passed
@matthieucan matthieucan deleted the matthieucan/better-readme branch September 23, 2025 15:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants