Skip to content

Fix MI100 counter names #848

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vedithal-amd
Copy link
Contributor

@vedithal-amd vedithal-amd commented Jul 31, 2025

  • Do not use custom definition for MI100 counters since rocprofiler-sdk supports MI100 counters

rocprofiler-compute Pull Request

Related Issue

  • Closes #

What type of PR is this? (check all that apply)

  • Bug Fix
  • Cherry Pick
  • Continuous Integration
  • Documentation Update
  • Feature
  • Optimization
  • Refactor
  • Other (please specify)

Technical Details

Have you added or updated tests to validate functionality?

  • Yes
  • No - does not apply to this PR

Added / Updated documentation?

  • Yes
  • No - does not apply to this PR

Have you updated CHANGELOG?

  • Yes
  • No - does not apply to this PR

Checklist to follow before merge

  • Ensure that the above rocprofiler-sdk change appears in mainline branch

* Do not use custom definition for MI100 counters since rocprofiler-sdk
  supports MI100 counters
@@ -274,13 +274,13 @@ Panel Config:
pop: ((100 * AVG((((TCC_EA_WRREQ_64B_sum * 64) + ((TCC_EA_WRREQ_sum - TCC_EA_WRREQ_64B_sum)
* 32)) / (End_Timestamp - Start_Timestamp)))) / $hbmBandwidth)
L2-Fabric Read Latency:
value: AVG(((TCC_EA_RDREQ_LEVEL_sum / TCC_EA_RDREQ_sum) if (TCC_EA_RDREQ_sum
value: AVG(((TCC_EA0_RDREQ_LEVEL_sum / TCC_EA0_RDREQ_sum) if (TCC_EA0_RDREQ_sum
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same for
TCC_EA0_WRREQ_sum
TCC_EA0_RDREQ_sum
TCC_EA0_WRREQ
TCC_EA0_RDREQ

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you're right!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants