Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

geoCaseStudy #55

Open
MBaranskiEBC opened this issue Jul 2, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

geoCaseStudy #55

MBaranskiEBC opened this issue Jul 2, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@MBaranskiEBC
Copy link
Contributor

Create a case study for geothermal energy based on the master branch.

@MBaranskiEBC MBaranskiEBC self-assigned this Jul 2, 2019
MBaranskiEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2019
MBaranskiEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2019
MStillerEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2019
…ed, #55

- add of complex field model field2 and its base class
- add of complex building model GeothermalHeatPump and its base classes, but still has to be modified
MStillerEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2019
…egral deviations, #55

- complex model for building with GeothermalHeatPump modified

- added Subsystem_complex.py and Init_complex.py for complex model settings
-> should replace Init.py and Subsystem.py when its ready and executable

- for demand in subsystem Building/GeothermalHeatPump implemented a multizone model and its DataBase specifications from TEASER
MStillerEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2019
MStillerEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 28, 2019
- to-do: implement "phase" to differ between heating & cooling period
- actually: only cooling field off (heat demand building) is implemented, heating up field (cold demand building) is implemented but still commented -> first needs the "phase" distinction
- actually: doing parametric study of cost factors in cooling field off status
MStillerEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2019
…ructured HeatPump Models including TEASER Model, #55
MStillerEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2019
MStillerEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2019
MStillerEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2019
MStillerEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2019
MBaranskiEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 6, 2019
MStillerEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 9, 2019
MStillerEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 25, 2019
…ed San Francisco weather data, #55

Note: weather datas relative path with "modelica://..." does not work! Total, local path has to be included to make it runnable!
MStillerEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2019
- no longer hysteresis
- now with bandwidth
MStillerEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 1, 2019
MStillerEBC added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 16, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant