Skip to content

SWATCH-3756: add POC IQE plugin that lives alongside rhsm-subscriptions #4782

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

TommasoLencioni
Copy link
Contributor

Jira issue: SWATCH-3756

Description

This PR is proof of concept and should not be merged.
This PR proposes to add an IQE plugin algoside rhsm-subscriptions code.
If this meets our needs we would be will have a smoothest develop and test experience.

Testing

This can be tested on both local and ephemeral.

Local testing setup

Detailed steps are in the document attached to the Jira issue.

  1. Checkout the branch.
  2. Activate the virtual environment.
  3. Install the new plugin alongside IQE.
  4. Set up the environment for local testing (set variables, run podman local cluster, run swatch-billable-usage)

Steps

  1. Run
    iqe tests plugin poc -k test_verify_ansible_usage

Verification

  1. Check if the test passes.

Ephemeral testing setup

Detailed steps are in the document attached to the Jira issue.

  1. Checkout the branch.
  2. Deploy an ephemeral environment.
  3. Deploy IQE on the ephemeral environment.
  4. Connect to the ephemeral environment.
  5. Copy the content of the new plugin to the IQE pod.
  6. Install the new plugin alongside IQE.

Ephemeral testing steps

  1. Inside IQE pod on EE run
    ENV_FOR_DYNACONF=clowder_smoke iqe tests plugin poc -k test_verify_ansible_usage

Ephemeral testing verification

  1. Check if the test passes.

@TommasoLencioni TommasoLencioni added the hold Pull requests that are on hold for a reason specified in a PR comment label Jul 23, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 23, 2025

⛏️ Workflow Run

🧹 Checkstyle

🧪 JUnit

TestsPassed ✅Skipped ⚠️Failed
JUnit Test Report1874 ran1868 passed6 skipped0 failed
Details
TestResult
No test annotations available

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hold Pull requests that are on hold for a reason specified in a PR comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant