Cleanup handling of vendored dependencies #29
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Jul 3, 2025
Contributor
|
Should we try and merge this @traversaro? No need to wait for upstream .. |
Tobias-Fischer
approved these changes
Jul 27, 2025
Member
Author
|
Sure, even if we do not build the packages now at least they are ready for the next rebuild. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is just a PR to showcase/test the application of ament/ament_cmake#592 . It permits to unvendor
_vendorpackages, while limiting the amount of patches to mantain. For now, let's keep it in draft until we get feedback in ament/ament_cmake#592 .