Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

StarWars5e - NPC Layout Improvement #13282

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

BE-Arbiter
Copy link
Contributor

@BE-Arbiter BE-Arbiter commented Sep 5, 2024

Submission Checklist

Required

  • The pull request title clearly contains the name of the sheet I am editing.
  • The pull request title clearly states the type of change I am submitting (New Sheet/New Feature/Bugfix/etc.).
  • The pull request makes changes to files in only one sub-folder.
  • The pull request does not contain changes to any json files in the translations folder (translation.json is permitted)

Changes / Description

  • Split design in two column
  • Allow to link npc traits to chat
  • Leading spaces corrections (Sorry about that)

Testing URL : https://app.roll20.net/join/17737343/0TAFzQ

@roll20deploy
Copy link
Contributor

Character Sheet Info Roll20 Internal Use only.

@BE-Arbiter BE-Arbiter changed the title StarWars5e - Correction StarWars5e - NPC Layout Improvement Sep 5, 2024
@BE-Arbiter
Copy link
Contributor Author

BE-Arbiter commented Sep 5, 2024

@Anduh Second try :')
I have provided a test-game for the changes.
I tried to get the Sw5e discord to react but as of now no one has reacted.

@Anduh
Copy link
Contributor

Anduh commented Sep 5, 2024

I'll see if I have time checking this over the weekend. If not, likely be the weekend after that.

If I haven't commented on this by Sunday at same o'clock, feel free to ping me again.

@NorWhal
Copy link
Contributor

NorWhal commented Sep 19, 2024

Hey @Anduh

Tagging you here for a follow-up! The usual wait period we have is three weeks of no response. Please let us know if you need more time.

Nora

@Anduh
Copy link
Contributor

Anduh commented Sep 20, 2024

Yeah I need time, hadn't found the time to review this properly, so was kicking it down the lane.
Should find the time to test it propely within the next 9 days.

@BE-Arbiter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Anduh Thank you :)

@kfroll20
Copy link
Contributor

kfroll20 commented Oct 8, 2024

Hello @Anduh,

Tagging you for another follow-up. Have you had a chance to take a look at this PR? Please let us know if we can move forward with merging these changes.

Thank you!

@BE-Arbiter
Copy link
Contributor Author

Unfortunately not yet.
I'm trying to have the rest of the community to have a look in the test game but, as fast as they were complaining when I broke something, there is not much activity to prevent the brokenness to happens =D

@NorWhal NorWhal marked this pull request as draft October 15, 2024 18:29
@NorWhal
Copy link
Contributor

NorWhal commented Oct 15, 2024

We've made this PR a draft while y'all are still in the testing phase of this project. Once @BE-Arbiter has finished with those tests and marked this as ready for review again, we’ll be looking to move forward with merging this PR. @Anduh if you have time to weigh in, we’d appreciate your insight, but we’ll merge as soon as Arbiter is happy with the testing.

@BE-Arbiter
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am personally happy with the tests I made. I'm just not sure it's good practice x').

@Anduh
Copy link
Contributor

Anduh commented Oct 18, 2024

will take a look this weekend

@NorWhal
Copy link
Contributor

NorWhal commented Nov 5, 2024

If there's no objections from @BE-Arbiter, we'll be merging this next Monday to give @Anduh one last weekend for review

@BE-Arbiter
Copy link
Contributor Author

No objections

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants