Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement initialize and finalize for symbolic callbacks #3162

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

BenChung
Copy link
Contributor

@BenChung BenChung commented Oct 29, 2024

Checklist

  • Appropriate tests were added
  • Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API
  • All documentation related to code changes were updated
  • The new code follows the
    contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
    COLPRAC.
  • Any new documentation only uses public API

Additional context

Add any other context about the problem here.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

This looks fine but it introduces test failures?

@BenChung
Copy link
Contributor Author

I looked at the test failures and couldn't figure out the attribution... is there a good way to tell which were broken by this PR vs. were broken beforehand?

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Open a PR that just changes whitespace on README called "test master" and compare. When I was last looking, LTS was all working though, but maybe one of @AayushSabharwal's changes in SciMLBase did something there.

@AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member

The failures are fixed by SciML/SciMLBase.jl#837

@AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member

Extension failures are fixed on master

@BenChung
Copy link
Contributor Author

As @AayushSabharwal says the test PR https://github.com/SciML/ModelingToolkit.jl/actions/runs/11582815665 also shows that the tests are currently broken; we could wait on his PR to merge for this one?

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Master should be fixed now? Rebase.

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 20b29de into SciML:master Nov 7, 2024
35 of 39 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants