Add docs page on how to use S3 data.

[pp-mo]

Closes #6374

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.20%. Comparing base (5d91446) to head (ecbca4e).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6951   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.20%   90.20%           
=======================================
  Files          91       91           
  Lines       24886    24886           
  Branches     4672     4672           
=======================================
  Hits        22449    22449           
  Misses       1667     1667           
  Partials      770      770           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[ukmo-ccbunney]

Hey @pp-mo
Generally this reads really well.
I have some small suggested changes.

The one issue I had though was that I could not install the s3-fuse package as detailed. I can see s3fs packages on pip and conda, but I think that these are not the fuse versions. This means I have not actually tested the instructions at this point.

There is a lot of ambiguity around the s3 packages it seems! If you can point me to the correct conda/pip package then I will test.

[pp-mo]

Sorry @ukmo-ccbunney I had a few suggestions of my own for your consideration,
which I apparently failed to post till now

[ukmo-ccbunney]

OK - so the instructions work for me once I installed s3fs-fuse via conda.
However, see comments regarding pip/PyPI - you can't install it this way (it is not a python package).

[pp-mo]

Thanks @ukmo-ccbunney for comprehensive + diligent review !

I think I've now covered all the points raised so far,

except what I commented about not giving any details of the credentials management : My thought there was that anyone using this would presumably have already dealt with that :
Happy to reconsider, if you think worhwhile.

Based on various earlier comments, I have tried to rationalise the use of bold "**" for names and code-format "``" for commands etc. Hope this now works for you but, again, open to discuss

[ukmo-ccbunney]

Just a few things, then I think we're good!

[pp-mo]

Thanks @ukmo-ccbunney .
Hopefully that fixes it!

[ukmo-ccbunney]

Great! Looking good. LGTM!

[pp-mo]

Great! Looking good. LGTM!

Thanks @ukmo-ccbunney !
And a great relief to get this done before #6868. Let them sort it ! 👿