Skip to content

Friction compensation #40

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 17, 2025
Merged

Friction compensation #40

merged 7 commits into from
Feb 17, 2025

Conversation

edantec
Copy link
Collaborator

@edantec edantec commented Feb 6, 2025

No description provided.

@edantec edantec requested a review from EtienneAr February 6, 2025 16:16
Copy link
Collaborator

@EtienneAr EtienneAr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @edantec!

@edantec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

edantec commented Feb 12, 2025

All fixes done, let me know what you think

@edantec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

edantec commented Feb 12, 2025

I've fixed the python example and the friction test. We should be good now.

@edantec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

edantec commented Feb 13, 2025

I have added back the throw exception because assert didn't warn us if the vectors have the right size (and this is dangerous).

@edantec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

edantec commented Feb 14, 2025

computeFriction now uses a proxy in python bindings. Note that in Python the torque vector provided in argument is still modified (so it is equal to the returned torque).

@EtienneAr EtienneAr merged commit d7b4950 into main Feb 17, 2025
11 checks passed
@edantec edantec deleted the topic/friction branch February 17, 2025 10:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants