Conversation
Member
|
@elidwa What would be the downside to using the "endpoint" field in the asset directory instead of creating a new field called "aws_s3_endpoint"? |
Contributor
Author
|
Using
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the first SlideRule supported dataset that is not hosted on AWS, even though it implements the S3 protocol. The data are hosted at the San Diego Supercomputer Center (SDSC) on an S3-compatible object storage system. SlideRule accesses the dataset via GDAL using the vsis3 virtual filesystem, which allows transparent access to non-AWS S3 endpoints.
Performance note
A benchmark was run using 26k pseudorandom sample points over the Grand Mesa region across two raster datasets hosted on different infrastructures and regions. esa-worldcover-10meter, hosted on AWS eu-central-1 (Frankfurt, Germany), completed in 2.64 seconds. In contrast, esa-copernicus-30meter, hosted at SDSC on an S3-compatible but non-AWS object store, completed in 12.27 seconds. This corresponds to a ~4.6× slowdown, or an approximately 365% increase in execution time, even when compared against a dataset hosted in Europe. The result highlights the performance impact of non-AWS S3 endpoints and cross-infrastructure access, despite both datasets being accessed via GDAL vsis3.