-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
SCAN4NET-70 Exclude analysis folders from dotCover #2197
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SCAN4NET-70 Exclude analysis folders from dotCover #2197
Conversation
7472022
to
67f0389
Compare
67f0389
to
fc468cd
Compare
This doesn't seem to work as I expected. |
fc468cd
to
db639be
Compare
Nevermind, I figured out my mistake. |
I added the IT! |
7cc79f1
to
2cf6d48
Compare
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ | |||
<!DOCTYPE html> | |||
<html class="main"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I run the dotCover tool just like in the documentation and dumped all the files here, so that we don't need to do it on every run of the test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please add a readme file that will explain the flow and contain the exact command?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done!
assertTrue(endStepResult.isSuccess()); | ||
assertThat(TestUtils.allIssues(ORCHESTRATOR)).hasSize(1) | ||
.extracting(Issues.Issue::getRule) | ||
.containsOnly("csharpsquid:S2699"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you take out my change with the coverage directory, this test fails because it finds a lot of issues in the css/html/js files of dotCover's directory.
9e3e84c
to
a7d50de
Compare
|
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ | |||
# DotCoverExcludedCoverage |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very nice! Thanks for adding it!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
SCAN4NET-70