Skip to content

CODEOWNERS proposal #334

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 24, 2025
Merged

CODEOWNERS proposal #334

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 24, 2025

Conversation

jschoone
Copy link

@jschoone jschoone commented Feb 17, 2025

As discussed in Project Board CW08, this is a proposal to test the CODEOWNERS
feature.
There is the branch restriction template owner_only which is only applied to
this repository and already contains an alternative to CODEOWNERS but this is
obviously not in use. That's why I just enabled the CODEOWNERS requirement
here.
Also added the project-board group and made this the code owners of the
CODEOWNERS file.

@jschoone jschoone force-pushed the feat/init_codeowners branch from a84b517 to 46d8a20 Compare February 21, 2025 15:14
Signed-off-by: Jan Schoone <[email protected]>

sort project team alphabetically
@jschoone jschoone force-pushed the feat/init_codeowners branch from 46d8a20 to 46fae93 Compare February 21, 2025 15:15
@jschoone jschoone changed the title feat(repo): initial and very simple proposal for CODEOWNERS to discus… CODEOWNERS proposal Feb 21, 2025
Copy link
Member

@fkr fkr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Member

@matofeder matofeder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@garloff garloff merged commit 9e0b45a into main Feb 24, 2025
5 checks passed
@garloff garloff deleted the feat/init_codeowners branch February 24, 2025 13:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants