Skip to content

Update dependency apple/swift-atomics to from: "1.3.0" #8

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 4, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
apple/swift-atomics minor from: "1.2.0" -> from: "1.3.0"

Release Notes

apple/swift-atomics (apple/swift-atomics)

v1.3.0: Swift Atomics 1.3.0

Compare Source

This minor release fixes a severe miscompilation issue when the experimental LTO feature is enabled. It also bumps the minimum supported toolchain to Swift 5.10, removing the obsolete atomics implementation that used to import operations from standard C.

There were no API-level changes. Clients on older toolchains will not be harmed by this tag -- they will continue to get version 1.2 (or 1.0, 1.1, depending on their toolchain version and dependency specification).

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: apple/swift-atomics@1.2.0...1.3.0


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants