Skip to content

Conversation

@0RAJA
Copy link
Collaborator

@0RAJA 0RAJA commented Oct 20, 2025

No description provided.

@0RAJA 0RAJA requested a review from JetDrag October 20, 2025 08:33
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 70.00000% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 77.23%. Comparing base (75690f8) to head (ad0b5d1).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/backend/manage.py 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1108   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.23%   77.23%           
=======================================
  Files         622      621    -1     
  Lines       27689    27691    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        21385    21388    +3     
+ Misses       6304     6303    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants