Skip to content

Issues: UDST/developer

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

25 Open 28 Closed
25 Open 28 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Fix failing Travis tests
#72 opened Jan 9, 2020 by smmaurer
_select_buildings() fails when self.target_units is pd.DataFrame Type: Bug
#70 opened Dec 9, 2019 by alephcero
Relax constraint of max FAR being below 20
#69 opened Jan 29, 2019 by hanase
1
Settings parcel_sizes should not influence the profit
#67 opened Dec 17, 2018 by hanase
4
Generalize max_height ProForma attributes
#58 opened Jun 5, 2017 by pksohn
Pro forma / developer logs
#57 opened May 4, 2017 by pksohn
Remove 'year_built' assignment in developer
#56 opened May 2, 2017 by pksohn
Better exit condition handling in developer model Type: Bug
#53 opened Apr 24, 2017 by pksohn
1
Parcels Aggregator Project: Development Pipeline
#46 opened Mar 28, 2017 by martjanz
1
Filtering building costs on height Project: Core Pro Forma Type: Question
#39 opened Mar 16, 2017 by pksohn
Make check_is_reasonable method parameterizable Priority: Medium Project: Core Pro Forma Type: Enhancement
#31 opened Mar 7, 2017 by martjanz
Add support for international metric system measure units (meters) Project: Core Pro Forma Type: Enhancement
#30 opened Mar 7, 2017 by martjanz
1
More flexibility in parking configuration options Project: Core Pro Forma Status: On Hold Type: Core Rewrite
#19 opened Feb 5, 2017 by pksohn
Trade-off evaluation Project: Other Issues Type: Enhancement
#16 opened Feb 1, 2017 by pksohn
Market analysis Project: Other Issues Type: Enhancement
#15 opened Feb 1, 2017 by pksohn
1
Uncertainty analysis with Monte Carlo simulation Project: Core Pro Forma Type: Enhancement
#14 opened Feb 1, 2017 by pksohn
Improve search over feasible project configurations Project: Core Pro Forma Type: Enhancement
#13 opened Feb 1, 2017 by pksohn
Split up large developments into phased subdivisions Project: Development Pipeline Type: Enhancement
#9 opened Feb 1, 2017 by pksohn
1
Single use buildings developed under mixed use zoning Client: SEMCOG Type: Bug
#8 opened Feb 1, 2017 by pksohn
Control over developed building types Client: SEMCOG Project: Existing Features Type: Enhancement
#7 opened Feb 1, 2017 by pksohn
Control speed at which phased developments are completed Client: SEMCOG Project: Development Pipeline Type: Enhancement
#6 opened Feb 1, 2017 by pksohn
Update housing prices used for development feasibility based on changing simulation conditions Client: SEMCOG Project: Other Issues Type: Question
#5 opened Feb 1, 2017 by pksohn
Known development pipeline with uncertainty about start date Client: MAG Project: Development Pipeline Type: Enhancement Type: Question
#4 opened Feb 1, 2017 by pksohn
1
Speed benchmarks Project: Existing Features Type: Maintenance
#3 opened Feb 1, 2017 by pksohn
@pksohn
Incorporate cash flow into pro forma calculations Project: Core Pro Forma Type: Enhancement
#1 opened Feb 1, 2017 by pksohn
2
ProTip! Adding no:label will show everything without a label.