Skip to content

Conversation

@Marwanfouz
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Please provide a brief summary of the changes in this PR.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Test case
  • Documentation update
  • Other (please describe)

Checklist

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (optional)
  • I have added necessary documentation (if applicable)

4- steps to test ?

Please provide a brief summary of the steps required to test the changes in this PR.

5- results ?

Please provide a brief summary of the results after testing the changes in this PR.

7- screenshots ?

Please provide screenshots of the results after testing the changes in this PR.

@Marwanfouz Marwanfouz self-assigned this Aug 17, 2025
entityId: detection.entityId || uri,
name: detection.name
}
name: name || detection.name,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if we found an entity are we still going to create a new one? for future

(if we used existing entity, then how would we handle a new name for it? we don't want to change previous claims; so we'll have to think about this)

Copy link
Collaborator

@gvelez17 gvelez17 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, we should use the name if available - for future we should think about whether we always want to cfdeate entities or use existing

@gvelez17 gvelez17 merged commit 37d7e5b into dev Aug 17, 2025
@gvelez17 gvelez17 deleted the fix/claim-name branch August 17, 2025 05:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants