Skip to content

manpage fido2-token.1: fido2-token -G -b -k does not require UV #874

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2025

Conversation

jo-bitsch
Copy link
Contributor

When you request the largeBlob based on the blob's base64-encoded 32 byte GCM key, the ctap standard does not require to get any pinUvAuthToken, as the largeBlob command can be sent directly. fido2-token does not require a PIN or equivalent user-verification gesture in this case. This commit just updates the documentation, to match the actual behavior.

The alternative command fido2-token -G -b -n does indeed first call credentialManagement to look up the key and therefore needs a token with the appropriate permission, so for the alternative command, this sentence is correct.

When you request the largeBlob based on the blob's base64-encoded 32 byte GCM key, the ctap standard does not require to get any pinUvAuthToken, as the largeBlob command can be sent directly. `fido2-token` does not require a PIN or equivalent user-verification gesture in this case. This commit just updates the documentation, to match the actual behavior.

The alternative command `fido2-token -G -b -n` does indeed first call credentialManagement to look up the key and therefore needs a token with the appropriate permission, so for the alternative command, this sentence is correct.
@LDVG LDVG merged commit 652b00f into Yubico:main May 30, 2025
39 of 42 checks passed
@LDVG
Copy link
Contributor

LDVG commented May 30, 2025

Indeed, thank you!

@jo-bitsch jo-bitsch deleted the patch-1 branch May 30, 2025 12:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants