Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

merge queue: embarking main (958fde3) and #730 together #775

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Nov 14, 2024

🎉 This pull request has been checked successfully and will be merged soon. 🎉

Branch main (958fde3) and #730 are embarked together for merge.

This pull request has been created by Mergify to speculatively check the mergeability of #730.
You don't need to do anything. Mergify will close this pull request automatically when it is complete.

Required conditions of queue main for merge:

Required conditions to stay in the queue:

---
previous_failed_batches: []
pull_requests:
  - number: 730
...

conduition and others added 15 commits October 4, 2024 15:34
This commit contains changes to the frost-core crate which
allow ciphersuites to better customize how signatures are computed.
This will enable taproot support without requiring major changes
to existing frost ciphersuites.

Co-authored by @zebra-lucky and @mimoo

This work sponsored by dlcbtc.com and lightspark.com
Co-authored by @zebra-lucky and @mimoo

This work sponsored by dlcbtc.com and lightspark.com
Co-authored by @zebra-lucky and @mimoo

This work sponsored by dlcbtc.com and lightspark.com
Uses r = e99ae2676eab512a3572c7b7655d633642a717250af57a7e0ccd5f9618b69f3f
With a couple of small adjustments to the code, we can remove the
need for this extra associated type on the Ciphersuite crate. Accepting
signature with odd-parity nonce values is OK, because BIP340 discard
the nonce parity bit anyway.
…tation

Thanks to @conradoplg for spotting this. The internal key is supposed
to be represented as an even-parity point when adding the TapTweak
point t*G. I added a regression test to ensure the tweaked verifying
key and its parity match the BIP341 spec.
@mergify mergify bot closed this Nov 14, 2024
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/merge-queue/f82ddd8541 branch November 14, 2024 13:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants