Skip to content

Add initial ProductIMDP framework #81

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Apr 28, 2025
Merged

Add initial ProductIMDP framework #81

merged 10 commits into from
Apr 28, 2025

Conversation

JeffersonYeh
Copy link
Collaborator

@JeffersonYeh JeffersonYeh commented Mar 12, 2025

Adds classes used for ProductIMDP value iteration including:

  • Abstract ProductIntervalMarkovProcess
  • ProductIntervalMarkovDecisionProcessDFA
  • Abstract DeterministicAutomaton
  • DFA
  • TransitionFunction (for the DFA)
  • Abstract Labelling and LabellingFunction (for the prodIMDP)

Copy link
Owner

@Zinoex Zinoex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a good first step - I have suggested some changes for you to improve the compatibility of the code and make the code more idiomatic.

It would be great if you could add accessor methods (e.g. getindex(dfa::DFA, z::Int, w::Int) or the same with a string letter) and test them to ensure correctness :-)

Copy link
Owner

@Zinoex Zinoex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I only have very minor comments about naming :-)

@JeffersonYeh JeffersonYeh marked this pull request as ready for review March 24, 2025 12:29
@JeffersonYeh JeffersonYeh changed the title Add initial DFA and DFA transition models Add initial ProductIMDP framework Mar 24, 2025
@JeffersonYeh JeffersonYeh force-pushed the prod-dfa branch 3 times, most recently from 6a60cd7 to a937b90 Compare April 28, 2025 12:19
@JeffersonYeh JeffersonYeh merged commit ef2167a into main Apr 28, 2025
4 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants