-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
[ECO-5146] feat: add connection implementation #69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request implement the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
113e730
to
ed3e1ad
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
chat-android/src/test/java/io/ably/lib/realtime/RealtimeUtils.kt (2)
30-33
: Update documentation to reflect connection functionalityThe documentation comment appears to be copied from
buildRealtimeChannel
and incorrectly refers to Channel objects. Please update it to accurately describe the connection-related functionality.-/** - * This function build realtime Channel object, it has backlink to the realtime client - * and also package-private constructor. - */ +/** + * This function builds a realtime Connection object, which has a backlink to the realtime client + * and a package-private constructor. + */
34-39
: Consider parameterizing the key for better test flexibilityThe function could be more flexible by accepting a key parameter, similar to how
buildRealtimeChannel
accepts a channel name parameter. This would allow tests to use different keys when needed.-fun buildRealtimeConnection() = AblyRealtime( +fun buildRealtimeConnection(key: String = "dummy-key") = AblyRealtime( ClientOptions().apply { - key = "dummy-key" + key = key autoConnect = false }, ).connectionchat-android/src/test/java/com/ably/chat/ConnectionTest.kt (2)
19-33
: Consider improving test setup readability and maintainability.While the setup is functionally correct, consider these improvements:
- Add KDoc comments to explain the test class purpose
- Extract the logger initialization into a constant
- Move the "TEST" tag to a companion object constant
class ConnectionTest { + companion object { + private const val TEST_TAG = "TEST" + private val TEST_LOGGER = EmptyLogger(LogContext(tag = TEST_TAG)) + } private val pubSubConnection = spyk<PubSubConnection>(buildRealtimeConnection()) private lateinit var connection: Connection private val pubSubConnectionStateListenerSlot = slot<ConnectionStateListener>() @Before fun setUp() { every { pubSubConnection.on(capture(pubSubConnectionStateListenerSlot)) } returns Unit pubSubConnection.state = ConnectionState.initialized - connection = DefaultConnection(pubSubConnection, EmptyLogger(LogContext(tag = "TEST"))) + connection = DefaultConnection(pubSubConnection, TEST_LOGGER) }
34-45
: Consider extracting test constants and reusing logger.The test is well-structured and documented, but could benefit from:
- Using the suggested TEST_LOGGER constant
- Extracting error constants for better maintainability
+ companion object { + private const val TEST_ERROR_MESSAGE = "some error" + private const val TEST_ERROR_CODE = 400 } @Test fun `initial status and error of the connection must be whatever status the realtime client returns`() = runTest { - pubSubConnection.reason = ErrorInfo("some error", 400) + pubSubConnection.reason = ErrorInfo(TEST_ERROR_MESSAGE, TEST_ERROR_CODE) pubSubConnection.state = ConnectionState.disconnected - val connection = DefaultConnection(pubSubConnection, EmptyLogger(LogContext(tag = "TEST"))) + val connection = DefaultConnection(pubSubConnection, TEST_LOGGER)chat-android/src/test/java/com/ably/chat/SandboxTest.kt (1)
72-88
: LGTM! Consider adding more test scenarios.The test correctly verifies the basic connection flow, ensuring proper status transition from Connecting to Connected state.
Consider adding the following test scenarios for more comprehensive coverage:
- Connection failure scenarios
- Connection timeout scenarios
- Retry mechanism verification
- Resource cleanup verification
Example structure for additional tests:
@Test fun `should handle connection failure`() = runTest { val chatClient = sandbox.createSandboxChatClient() val connectionStatusChange = CompletableDeferred<ConnectionStatusChange>() // Simulate connection failure and verify error handling } @Test fun `should handle connection timeout`() = runTest { val chatClient = sandbox.createSandboxChatClient() val connectionStatusChange = CompletableDeferred<ConnectionStatusChange>() // Simulate timeout and verify retry behavior }chat-android/src/main/java/com/ably/chat/Connection.kt (2)
140-141
: UsesetOf
instead oflistOf
fornextStatus
comparisonIn the conditional check, using
setOf
instead oflistOf
for thenextStatus
comparison can provide better performance due to fasterin
checks with sets.Apply the following change:
- if (transientDisconnectTimerIsActive && nextStatus in listOf(ConnectionStatus.Connecting, ConnectionStatus.Disconnected)) + if (transientDisconnectTimerIsActive && nextStatus in setOf(ConnectionStatus.Connecting, ConnectionStatus.Disconnected))
173-173
: Include error information in log messages for better diagnosticsWhen logging connection state changes, consider including the
error
information if it is available. This can aid in diagnosing connection issues.Apply the following change:
- logger.info("Connection state changed from ${previous.stateName} to ${nextStatus.stateName}") + logger.info("Connection state changed from ${previous.stateName} to ${nextStatus.stateName}. Error: ${error?.message}")
🛑 Comments failed to post (4)
chat-android/src/test/java/com/ably/chat/ConnectionTest.kt (1)
19-75: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the evidence gathered, I can now provide the final response:
Add test coverage for connected, suspended, and failed connection states
The current test file only covers transitions between
initialized
,connecting
, anddisconnected
states. However, fromConnection.kt
, we can see that the implementation handles all states: connected, suspended, failed, closing, and closed. Add test cases to verify:
- Transition to Connected state
- Transition to Suspended state
- Transition to Failed state (including closing and closed states which map to Failed)
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding test coverage for all connection states.
While the existing tests are well-implemented, consider adding test cases for other connection states (e.g., connected, failed, suspended) to ensure comprehensive coverage of the connection lifecycle.
Let me verify the test coverage further by checking for any additional test files and connection state related tests.
Let me try a different approach to check the test coverage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other connection state test coverage in the codebase rg "ConnectionState\." --type kotlinLength of output: 1539
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all test files related to connection fd ".*Test\.kt" --type f --exec ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ { $$$ @Test fun $_($$$) { $$$ ConnectionState.$_ $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for test methods in ConnectionTest.kt with more context rg "@Test" chat-android/src/test/java/com/ably/chat/ConnectionTest.kt -B 1 -A 10Length of output: 1049
chat-android/src/main/java/com/ably/chat/Connection.kt (3)
133-157:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential memory leak: Listener to
pubSubConnection
is not removedIn the
init
block, a listener is registered topubSubConnection
viapubSubConnection.on { ... }
, but there is no mechanism to remove this listener whenDefaultConnection
is no longer needed. This could lead to memory leaks if instances ofDefaultConnection
are created and discarded over time.Consider storing the listener reference returned by
pubSubConnection.on
and providing a method to unregister or dispose of the listener when theDefaultConnection
instance is no longer in use.
119-119:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure
connectionScope
is properly cancelled to prevent coroutine leaksThe
connectionScope
is created with aSupervisorJob()
, but there is no mechanism to cancel this scope whenDefaultConnection
is no longer in use. This may result in coroutines running longer than necessary.Propose adding a
close()
ordispose()
method toDefaultConnection
that cancels theconnectionScope
to clean up resources appropriately.
189-199: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reconsider mapping
closing
andclosed
states toFailed
In the
mapPubSubStatusToChat
function, bothConnectionState.closing
andConnectionState.closed
are mapped toConnectionStatus.Failed
. These states typically indicate a normal shutdown rather than a failure.Consider introducing new
ConnectionStatus
values forClosing
andClosed
, or mapping them to an existing status that better represents a clean shutdown, such as a newConnectionStatus.Closed
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
chat-android/src/main/java/com/ably/chat/ChatClient.kt (1)
Remove the unnecessary NotImplementedDeclaration suppression
After reviewing the complete file, there are no unimplemented declarations or TODOs present. All interface methods in
ChatClient
are properly implemented inDefaultChatClient
. The@file:Suppress("NotImplementedDeclaration")
annotation is no longer needed and can be safely removed.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-1
: Consider removing the NotImplementedDeclaration suppression.Now that the connection property is implemented, verify if this file-level suppression is still necessary. There might have been other TODOs that required this suppression.
Let's check for any remaining TODO or unimplemented declarations:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for remaining TODOs or unimplemented declarations # Expected: No TODOs or unimplemented declarations found echo "Checking for TODO comments:" rg -i "todo|not.*implemented" chat-android/src/main/java/com/ably/chat/ChatClient.ktLength of output: 195
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for any method declarations that might be marked as 'TODO' or empty ast-grep --pattern 'fun $name($$$) {}' chat-android/src/main/java/com/ably/chat/ChatClient.kt # Also check for any method declarations with 'TODO' in their body ast-grep --pattern 'fun $name($$$) { TODO($$$) }' chat-android/src/main/java/com/ably/chat/ChatClient.ktLength of output: 204
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's get the full content of the file to analyze all declarations cat chat-android/src/main/java/com/ably/chat/ChatClient.ktLength of output: 2448
chat-android/src/test/java/com/ably/chat/ConnectionTest.kt (3)
20-20
: Consider using a pure mock instead of spyk with real connection.Creating a real connection in tests using
buildRealtimeConnection()
could lead to:
- Potential network connections during tests
- Flaky or slow tests
- Unexpected side effects
Consider replacing with a pure mock:
-private val pubSubConnection = spyk<PubSubConnection>(buildRealtimeConnection()) +private val pubSubConnection = mockk<PubSubConnection>()
33-44
: Consider adding more test cases for comprehensive coverage.While the current test verifies the disconnected state well, consider adding test cases for:
- Other connection states (connected, connecting, etc.)
- Null error scenarios
- Edge cases with different error types
Example additional test:
@Test fun `initial status should handle null error`() = runTest { pubSubConnection.reason = null pubSubConnection.state = ConnectionState.connected val connection = DefaultConnection(pubSubConnection, EmptyLogger(LogContext(tag = "TEST"))) assertEquals(ConnectionStatus.Connected, connection.status) assertEquals(null, connection.error) }
46-75
: Enhance status transition test coverage.The current test verifies a single transition well, but consider adding tests for:
- Multiple sequential status changes
- Error propagation during transitions
- All possible state transitions
- Edge cases (e.g., rapid state changes)
Example additional test:
@Test fun `should handle multiple sequential status changes`() = runTest { val statusChanges = mutableListOf<ConnectionStatusChange>() connection.onStatusChange { statusChanges.add(it) } // Simulate connection lifecycle listOf( ConnectionState.initialized to ConnectionState.connecting, ConnectionState.connecting to ConnectionState.connected, ConnectionState.connected to ConnectionState.disconnected ).forEach { (from, to) -> pubSubConnectionStateListenerSlot.captured.onConnectionStateChanged( ConnectionStateChange(from, to, 0, null) ) } assertEquals(3, statusChanges.size) // Add specific assertions for each transition }chat-android/src/main/java/com/ably/chat/Connection.kt (3)
17-19
: Add rationale for the timeout valueWhile the constant is documented as a "Default timeout for transient states", it would be helpful to explain why 5000ms was chosen as the specific value. This helps future maintainers understand if this value needs adjustment based on different scenarios.
144-150
: Improve transient disconnect handling resilienceThe transient disconnect logic could be more resilient by:
- Storing the job reference atomically
- Adding null safety checks
- Handling edge cases where multiple state changes occur rapidly
-if (nextStatus == ConnectionStatus.Disconnected && status == ConnectionStatus.Connected) { - transientDisconnectJob = connectionScope.launch { - delay(TRANSIENT_TIMEOUT.milliseconds) - applyStatusChange(nextStatus, stateChange.reason, stateChange.retryIn) - transientDisconnectJob = null - } +if (nextStatus == ConnectionStatus.Disconnected && status == ConnectionStatus.Connected) { + val newJob = connectionScope.launch { + try { + delay(TRANSIENT_TIMEOUT.milliseconds) + applyStatusChange(nextStatus, stateChange.reason, stateChange.retryIn) + } finally { + transientDisconnectJob = null + } + } + transientDisconnectJob?.cancel() + transientDisconnectJob = newJob
159-167
: Prevent potential memory leaks in listener managementThe current implementation of onStatusChange doesn't handle the case where listeners might accumulate if clients forget to call unsubscribe. Consider:
- Adding a weak reference mechanism for listeners
- Implementing a cleanup mechanism for stale listeners
Would you like me to provide an implementation using WeakReference for the listeners?
detekt.yml (1)
101-101
: Consider documenting the rationale for deactivating LabeledExpression.While labeled expressions can be useful in complex coroutine contexts (like connection handling), it would be helpful to document why this check was disabled to maintain configuration transparency.
LabeledExpression: - active: false + active: false # Disabled to support labeled breaks/continues in connection handling
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
chat-android/src/main/java/com/ably/chat/ChatClient.kt
(1 hunks)chat-android/src/main/java/com/ably/chat/Connection.kt
(3 hunks)chat-android/src/test/java/com/ably/chat/ConnectionTest.kt
(1 hunks)chat-android/src/test/java/com/ably/chat/SandboxTest.kt
(1 hunks)chat-android/src/test/java/io/ably/lib/realtime/RealtimeUtils.kt
(1 hunks)detekt.yml
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- chat-android/src/test/java/com/ably/chat/SandboxTest.kt
- chat-android/src/test/java/io/ably/lib/realtime/RealtimeUtils.kt
🔇 Additional comments (8)
chat-android/src/main/java/com/ably/chat/ChatClient.kt (2)
68-71
: LGTM! Clean implementation of the connection property.
The implementation follows the established patterns in the codebase:
- Properly delegates to the underlying realtime connection
- Maintains consistent logging context with other components
Let's verify the DefaultConnection implementation exists and matches the usage:
✅ Verification successful
Implementation matches usage and follows the interface contract correctly
The DefaultConnection implementation in Connection.kt perfectly matches its usage in ChatClient.kt:
- Takes exactly the required parameters:
pubSubConnection
andlogger
- Implements the Connection interface
- Properly handles connection state management and status changes
- Maintains consistent logging practices
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify DefaultConnection class implementation
# Expected: Find DefaultConnection class with matching constructor parameters
ast-grep --pattern 'class DefaultConnection(
$pubSubConnection: $_,
$logger: $_
) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for DefaultConnection class
ast-grep --pattern 'class DefaultConnection'
# Also search for the file containing DefaultConnection
fd "DefaultConnection"
# Backup: search for any mention of DefaultConnection in kotlin files
rg "DefaultConnection" -t kotlin
Length of output: 621
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the DefaultConnection implementation in Connection.kt
cat chat-android/src/main/java/com/ably/chat/Connection.kt
Length of output: 6428
68-71
: Verify connection state logging initialization.
The connection state is used in buildLogContext's dynamic context. Ensure that the connection state is available when logging is initialized.
Let's check the initialization order and usage:
Also applies to: 77-84
✅ Verification successful
Connection state logging is properly initialized and handled
The connection state is correctly initialized and managed:
- Connection status is immediately initialized using
mapPubSubStatusToChat(pubSubConnection.state)
- Status mapping is properly implemented with all required states
- Changes are tracked through listeners and the status is kept in sync with the underlying pubSubConnection
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential initialization issues with connection state logging
# Expected: Find connection state handling in DefaultConnection
# Search for connection state handling
ast-grep --pattern 'class DefaultConnection {
$$$
$state: $_ {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find connection state handling
# Find the DefaultConnection class implementation
rg "class DefaultConnection" -A 10
# Search for connection state property or method
rg "override.*state" --type kotlin
# Look for buildLogContext implementation
rg "buildLogContext.*connection" --type kotlin
Length of output: 1246
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the connection status mapping and initialization
# Find the mapPubSubStatusToChat implementation
rg "mapPubSubStatusToChat" -A 5
# Check for connection status updates
rg "status.*=.*mapPubSubStatusToChat" -A 5
# Look for any connection state listeners
rg "Connection\.Listener" -A 5
Length of output: 3674
chat-android/src/test/java/com/ably/chat/ConnectionTest.kt (2)
1-17
: LGTM! Well-organized imports and package structure.
Good use of import alias to avoid naming conflicts between io.ably.lib.realtime.Connection
and the local Connection
interface.
53-55
: Verify connection listener cleanup.
The test adds a connection status listener but doesn't verify its cleanup. Consider:
- Adding tests to verify listener removal
- Checking for potential memory leaks
- Testing cleanup during connection disposal
chat-android/src/main/java/com/ably/chat/Connection.kt (3)
21-53
: Well-structured and documented connection states
The ConnectionStatus enum is well-implemented with clear documentation for each state and proper string representations. The states cover all necessary scenarios in the connection lifecycle.
Line range hint 55-77
: Well-designed status change data structure
The ConnectionStatusChange data class effectively captures all necessary information for connection state transitions, including error handling and retry logic.
189-199
: Clean and comprehensive status mapping
The mapPubSubStatusToChat function provides a complete and correct mapping of all possible Ably connection states to internal ConnectionStatus values.
detekt.yml (1)
Line range hint 1-1000
: Review the security implications of disabled checks.
The configuration has disabled several important static analysis checks, particularly in the coroutines and potential-bugs sections. While this may be necessary for implementing connection features, consider:
- Re-enabling critical checks like
CastNullableToNonNullableType
andNullCheckOnMutableProperty
with specific exclusions instead of completely disabling them. - Adding custom configuration for coroutine-related checks instead of disabling them entirely.
✅ Verification successful
Disabled checks have minimal impact on codebase safety
Based on the analysis:
- Only 4 non-null assertions (
!!
) found, with 3 in test code and 1 in a controlled utility function - No unsafe GlobalScope usage detected
- Single lateinit usage confined to test code
- No unsafe coroutine patterns or cancellation handling issues found
The disabled checks in detekt.yml appear to have minimal security impact as the codebase already follows safe practices. The few instances of potentially unsafe patterns are either in test code or have controlled usage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of disabled checks on the codebase
# Check for potential null safety issues that might be missed
echo "Checking for potential null safety issues..."
rg "!!" --type kotlin
# Check for unsafe coroutine usage patterns
echo "Checking for potentially unsafe coroutine patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'suspend fun $name($$$) {
$$$
withContext($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 909
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for more potential issues in coroutines and null safety
# Check for GlobalScope usage which is discouraged
echo "Checking for GlobalScope usage..."
rg "GlobalScope\." --type kotlin
# Check for potential race conditions with lateinit
echo "Checking for lateinit vars..."
ast-grep --pattern 'lateinit var $_: $_'
# Check for potential suspend function cancellation issues
echo "Checking for potential cancellation issues..."
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
$$$
} catch ($ex: CancellationException) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 507
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't go through each piece of code.
Just looking at the tests/spec points, it seems good enough for our use-case.
Connection feature
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests