Skip to content

[imp] repo.collect_prs_info allow to pass custom merges #91

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2025

Conversation

simahawk
Copy link
Contributor

Very handy to be able to feed it with custom PRs info. Example: provide a parsed version of shell_after_commands containing PR patches.

@simahawk
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sbidoul time to cleanup? :)

Run actions/setup-python@v4
Installed versions
  Version 3.7 was not found in the local cache
  Error: The version '3.7' with architecture 'x64' was not found for Ubuntu 24.04.
  The list of all available versions can be found here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/actions/python-versions/main/versions-manifest.json

@sbidoul
Copy link
Member

sbidoul commented Mar 21, 2025

Yes we can drop 3.7 and 3.8, and add 3.12 and 3.12.

@simahawk
Copy link
Contributor Author

#92

Very handy to be able to feed it with custom PRs info.
Example: provide a parsed version of shell_after_commands containing PR patches.
@simahawk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased

Copy link
Member

@sbidoul sbidoul left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess it does not harm :)

Keep in mind that this project does not have a documented public API beyond the CLI.

@simahawk
Copy link
Contributor Author

I take the risk 😜

@sbidoul sbidoul merged commit 582d365 into acsone:master Mar 21, 2025
6 checks passed
@simahawk
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sbidoul would it be possible to have a release?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants