Skip to content

Conversation

@abhishekdwivedi3060
Copy link
Contributor

@abhishekdwivedi3060 abhishekdwivedi3060 commented Sep 17, 2025

  • Add support for vertical scaling (storage scaling)
  • Handle nodeID generation dynamically based on RackRevision

@abhishekdwivedi3060 abhishekdwivedi3060 force-pushed the feature/KO-448-support-vertical-scaling branch from ecf6c85 to ac551ba Compare September 17, 2025 19:24
@abhishekdwivedi3060 abhishekdwivedi3060 changed the title [WIP] feat: Add support for vertical scaling (storage scaling) [KO-448] feat: Add support for vertical scaling (storage scaling) [KO-448] Sep 23, 2025
pkg/utils.go Outdated
aeroCluster *asdbv1.AerospikeCluster, rackID int, podName,
rackRevision string,
) (string, error) {
const allowed = "bcedf"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why const allowed = "bcedf"?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

node-id is a hexa decimal value. It cake take abcdef chars only. We are already using a char always for the existing flow without rack-revision. So with the new change, we are allowing other remaining chars for multiple rack-revisions

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we change it to bcdef?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, good catch. That was a typo. Fixed it

jwalantmodi05
jwalantmodi05 previously approved these changes Nov 12, 2025
@abhishekdwivedi3060 abhishekdwivedi3060 merged commit 7dfa450 into master Nov 12, 2025
9 checks passed
@abhishekdwivedi3060 abhishekdwivedi3060 deleted the feature/KO-448-support-vertical-scaling branch November 12, 2025 12:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants