Skip to content

Conversation

@arrowplum
Copy link
Contributor

@arrowplum arrowplum commented Nov 5, 2025

This PR is for investigating oidc errors in the test step of the new workflow.

The main fix is adjusting the oidc parameters to match the others.

The tests still fail but installing the rpm works as intended.

This also comments out the majority of the builds to focus on just one for testing.

@arrowplum arrowplum marked this pull request as draft November 5, 2025 23:48
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 5, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.15%. Comparing base (c7b5aa5) to head (fb635d0).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #83   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.15%   76.15%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        1086     1086           
=======================================
  Hits          827      827           
  Misses        190      190           
  Partials       69       69           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@arrowplum arrowplum changed the title test(workflows): [SERVER-216] testing oidc for rpm/deb pulling test(workflows): [SERVER-465] testing oidc for rpm/deb pulling Nov 6, 2025
@arrowplum arrowplum requested a review from cinterloper November 6, 2025 00:36
@arrowplum arrowplum changed the base branch from main to dev/SERVER-216 November 6, 2025 00:37
@arrowplum arrowplum marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2025 00:39
@cinterloper cinterloper force-pushed the dev/SERVER-216 branch 2 times, most recently from 38ba5ae to 571bfa9 Compare November 14, 2025 22:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants