Skip to content

Add content-block-editor to repos.yml #1923

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2025
Merged

Conversation

pezholio
Copy link
Contributor

@pezholio pezholio commented Apr 1, 2025

This is a protoype JS library to demonstrate how we could highlight content blocks within publishing apps.

required_status_checks:
standard_contexts: *standard_security_checks
additional_contexts:
- CI
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not going to work since it's a workflow name, while it should be job name.

I suggest adding job names in https://github.com/alphagov/whitehall/tree/main/.github/workflows to use them here to configure branch protection rules (alternatively you can get ids). For workflows that use reusable workflows, the pattern is <initial_workflow.jobs.job.[name/id]> / <reused-workflow.jobs.job.[name/id]>.

There's a lot of examples in other repos.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! This should do the trick.

@pezholio pezholio force-pushed the add-content-block-editor branch from fb0a07f to d5f7bdb Compare April 10, 2025 15:25
@pezholio pezholio requested a review from AgaDufrat April 10, 2025 15:26
@pezholio pezholio merged commit 66ef3f9 into main Apr 10, 2025
3 checks passed
@pezholio pezholio deleted the add-content-block-editor branch April 10, 2025 16:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants