Skip to content

Issues: anima-wg/constrained-join-proxy

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

15 Open 26 Closed
15 Open 26 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Registrar aliveness problem and text
#65 opened Sep 24, 2024 by toerless
1
Check wording of the mandatory-to-implement text (Section 4.0)
#64 opened Jun 11, 2024 by EskoDijk
@toerless
4
Explain for stateful JP, that it needs to pick a new UDP source port for every unique Pledge
#63 opened Jun 11, 2024 by EskoDijk
Update reference 8366 to 8366bis
#62 opened Mar 26, 2024 by EskoDijk
Text & section references to [I-D.ietf-anima-constrained-voucher] are not up to date anymore
#61 opened Feb 2, 2024 by EskoDijk
Objective BRSKI_JP not formally defined and name is confusing issue-for-wg Issue needs to be taken to WG for discussion.
#60 opened Oct 13, 2023 by EskoDijk
2
use consistent short version for proxy
#58 opened Sep 12, 2023 by mcr
context payload text is confusing
#49 opened Aug 29, 2023 by mcr
section 4.1, rewrite
#48 opened Aug 29, 2023 by mcr
1
abstract uses terms not yet defined
#47 opened Aug 29, 2023 by mcr
What should a join proxy due when it has access to multiple registrars?
#45 opened Jan 3, 2023 by mcr
10
fix text that says to use RFC9148 discovery
#34 opened Jul 12, 2022 by mcr
@mcr
1
Add security consideration that Join Proxy might discover the wrong "Registrar" issue-for-wg Issue needs to be taken to WG for discussion.
#33 opened Jul 5, 2022 by EskoDijk
@EskoDijk
1
RW: ANIMA ACP normative statement
#25 opened Jun 9, 2022 by mcr
@mcr
The 6tisch version needs more explanation
#18 opened Apr 28, 2022 by mcr
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.