Add support for ruff

[felixfontein]

Fixes #70.

• Support ruff check
• Support ruff format
• Support ruff check --fix

CC @gotmax23

[gotmax23]

I'll take a closer look later, but I think it'd make sense to have just one option to specify the ruff config globally and maybe to remove the somewhat opinionated --select=I default.

[felixfontein]

I'll take a closer look later, but I think it'd make sense to have just one option to specify the ruff config globally

I guess that could be added as an additional feature. Several options (like line length) are global and cannot be configured differently for formatter and linter. That's why I think it's better to be able to configure different config files per situation.

maybe to remove the somewhat opinionated --select=I default.

Without the default, I guess all possible fixes are applied?

[oraNod]

LGTM. Although it looks like there might be some error highlighting in the docs file:

I didn't spot what might be causing that though.

[felixfontein]

Hmm, maybe GitHub's syntax highlighter doesn't like indented code blocks / code blocks in lists? 🤷 In any case, my editor doesn't complain, and neither does mkdocs...

[felixfontein]

I'm moving the general docs improvments from this PR to #84 and will rebase once that's merged.

[felixfontein]

@gotmax23 can you please take another look? Thanks.

[gotmax23]

I think a global ruff_package option that behaves that has the same overridable behavior as the global ruff_config also makes sense, but other than that, this looks good to me. Thanks!

[gotmax23]

Suggested change

	ruff_autofix_select=(
	["I"] if ruff_autofix_select is None else ruff_autofix_select
	),
	ruff_autofix_select=ruff_autofix_select,