Redact extra fields for Asset Endpoints in fastAPI #44069
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vatsrahul1001
requested review from
ephraimbuddy and
pierrejeambrun
as code owners
|
@pierrejeambrun I have |
vatsrahul1001
force-pushed
the
redact-extra-field-in-assets-endpoints
branch
from
9bde963
to
81699ab
Compare
…a-field-in-assets-endpoints
…stronomer/airflow into redact-extra-field-in-assets-endpoints taking latst
amoghrajesh
pushed a commit
to astronomer/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2024
* redact extra fields in asset endpoints for fast api * redact extra fields in asset endpoints for fast api * updating test name correctly * removing duplicated time_freezer
kandharvishnu
pushed a commit
to kandharvishnu/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2024
* redact extra fields in asset endpoints for fast api * redact extra fields in asset endpoints for fast api * updating test name correctly * removing duplicated time_freezer
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR address the review comment in Asset migration PR. We noticed
extraare redacted in the Log table, but not in the plain response from Asset Legacy API. Querying the events shouldn't return sensitive values in plain text. This PR handles that in fastAPI.Testing
Asset events reponse
Asset response
create Asset response
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.