Updated arrow-pyarrow to use pyo3 0.27, updated deprecated code warnings #8773
+76
−34
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
# Conflicts: # arrow-pyarrow/src/lib.rs
kylebarron
reviewed
Nov 3, 2025
kylebarron
approved these changes
Nov 3, 2025
mbrobbel
added
api-change
Co-authored-by: Matthijs Brobbel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Matthijs Brobbel <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
No issue, I'm aware of. Just updates pyo3 to 0.27 so delta-rs can start looking at variant adoption.
Rationale for this change
There is a long list of dependencies for arrow 57 to be supported in enough places such that delta-rs can start to reliably build against them. Updating pyo3 puts arrow in line with the other arrow based dependencies.
Are these changes tested?
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
Since this is a good amount of unsafe, and I'm on Windows (which I'd imagine is not the common path) I'd like to see the CI/CD run just to make sure everything looks good.
If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are they covered by existing tests)?
Are there any user-facing changes?
Just that a dependency is now a later version