-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
agent: increase timeout for host arch retrieval #11822
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 4.20
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Cherry-picked from 44f8064 Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <[email protected]>
@blueorangutan package |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
clgtm
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.20 #11822 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 16.17% 16.17% -0.01%
- Complexity 13297 13298 +1
============================================
Files 5656 5656
Lines 498331 498331
Branches 60476 60476
============================================
- Hits 80591 80590 -1
- Misses 408767 408769 +2
+ Partials 8973 8972 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
final Script command = new Script("/usr/bin/arch", 500, logger); | ||
final OutputInterpreter.OneLineParser parser = new OutputInterpreter.OneLineParser(); | ||
return command.execute(parser); | ||
String arch = Script.runSimpleBashScript(Script.getExecutableAbsolutePath("arch"), 2000); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
original PR had timeout as 1000 (base on my tests with OL8 x86_64 #11251 (comment)), this has 2000. Is there a new finding? Would it make sense to make this configurable then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rohityadavcloud
would it be better same as #11254 ?
can you test the changes ? thanks |
Backport 44f8064 from #11254
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?