Skip to content

[FLINK-37427] Fix incorrect NPE message in StandaloneHaServices constructor #26258

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lurongjiang
Copy link

@lurongjiang lurongjiang commented Mar 6, 2025

What is the purpose of the change

developers receive unhelpful error messages when parameters are null.

Brief change log

Replace checkNotNull(clusterRestEndpointAddress, clusterRestEndpointAddress) with checkNotNull(clusterRestEndpointAddress, "clusterRestEndpointAddress") to ensure the exception message clearly identifies the null parameter.

Verifying this change

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): no
  • The serializers: no
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: no
  • The S3 file system connector: no

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no

Replace checkNotNull(clusterRestEndpointAddress, clusterRestEndpointAddress) with checkNotNull(clusterRestEndpointAddress, "clusterRestEndpointAddress") to ensure the exception message clearly identifies the null parameter.
@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Mar 6, 2025

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

Copy link
Contributor

@davidradl davidradl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: could we have a unit test, to check that null values are handled as expected. As this is a trivial change - it is your call as to whether you add this.

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ public StandaloneHaServices(
checkNotNull(resourceManagerAddress, "resourceManagerAddress");
this.dispatcherAddress = checkNotNull(dispatcherAddress, "dispatcherAddress");
this.clusterRestEndpointAddress =
checkNotNull(clusterRestEndpointAddress, clusterRestEndpointAddress);
checkNotNull(clusterRestEndpointAddress, "clusterRestEndpointAddress");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: we could correct the javadoc and add this parameter while we are here.

Copy link
Contributor

@davidradl davidradl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approving

  • raised some nits but these are nice to haves and the change looks good.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 5, 2025

This PR is being marked as stale since it has not had any activity in the last 90 days.
If you would like to keep this PR alive, please leave a comment asking for a review.
If the PR has merge conflicts, update it with the latest from the base branch.

If you are having difficulty finding a reviewer, please reach out to the
community, contact details can be found here: https://flink.apache.org/what-is-flink/community/

If this PR is no longer valid or desired, please feel free to close it.
If no activity occurs in the next 30 days, it will be automatically closed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jun 5, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added community-reviewed PR has been reviewed by the community. and removed stale community-reviewed PR has been reviewed by the community. labels Jun 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community-reviewed PR has been reviewed by the community.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants