Skip to content

[#2563] improvement(spark): Add more logs of shuffle write on reassignment failure #2564

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2025

Conversation

zuston
Copy link
Member

@zuston zuston commented Jul 29, 2025

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR is to add more logs of shuffle write on reassignment failure for the next inspection when it occurs.

Why are the changes needed?

for #2563 .

25/07/29 08:13:25 ERROR TaskResources: Task 14257 failed by error: 
org.apache.uniffle.common.exception.RssException: No available replacement server for: 10.xxxxx-23100-23104
	at org.apache.spark.shuffle.writer.RssShuffleWriter.reassignAndResendBlocks(RssShuffleWriter.java:832)
	at org.apache.spark.shuffle.writer.RssShuffleWriter.collectFailedBlocksToResend(RssShuffleWriter.java:672)
	at org.apache.spark.shuffle.writer.RssShuffleWriter.checkDataIfAnyFailure(RssShuffleWriter.java:570)
	at org.apache.spark.shuffle.writer.RssShuffleWriter.checkBlockSendResult(RssShuffleWriter.java:532)
	at org.apache.spark.shuffle.writer.RssShuffleWriter.internalCheckBlockSendResult(RssShuffleWriter.java:518)

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Neen't

Copy link

Test Results

 3 082 files  ±0   3 082 suites  ±0   6h 50m 6s ⏱️ +9s
 1 193 tests ±0   1 192 ✅ ±0   1 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
15 123 runs  ±0  15 108 ✅ ±0  15 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 46429f6. ± Comparison against base commit 1713c1f.

@zuston zuston merged commit 066e71e into apache:master Jul 30, 2025
41 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants