Skip to content

Conversation

pbacsko
Copy link
Contributor

@pbacsko pbacsko commented Aug 18, 2025

What is this PR for?

Change import from "gopkg.in/yaml.v3" to "go.yaml.in/yaml/v3"

What type of PR is it?

  • - Bug Fix
  • - Improvement
  • - Feature
  • - Documentation
  • - Hot Fix
  • - Refactoring

Todos

  • - Task

What is the Jira issue?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YUNIKORN-3114

How should this be tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Questions:

  • - The licenses files need update.
  • - There is breaking changes for older versions.
  • - It needs documentation.

Change import from "gopkg.in/yaml.v3" to "go.yaml.in/yaml/v3"
@pbacsko pbacsko self-assigned this Aug 18, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 18, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 65.89%. Comparing base (4dc1820) to head (8338da0).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #983      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.87%   65.89%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          72       72              
  Lines        9297     9297              
==========================================
+ Hits         6124     6126       +2     
+ Misses       2961     2959       -2     
  Partials      212      212              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

gopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch.v4 v4.12.0 // indirect
gopkg.in/inf.v0 v0.9.1 // indirect
gopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2 v2.2.1 // indirect
gopkg.in/yaml.v3 v3.0.1 // indirect
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this older version of yaml used by some other deps?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@pbacsko pbacsko Aug 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct - we're no longer using it directly after the PR is merged

@manirajv06 manirajv06 self-requested a review August 18, 2025 16:39
Copy link
Contributor

@manirajv06 manirajv06 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good

@pbacsko pbacsko closed this in 35fb397 Aug 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants